London Review of Books - London Review of Books
Trina Macleod’s Booktaste Blog. SEX sells. Everyone knows this. Since Adam and Eve donned figleafs the earth has appreciated a risqu read. And once more comes the proof, with British magazines and newspapers revelling in muck that’s two centuries old. Even straitlaced Aunty, the British Broadcasting Corporation, found naughty bits to pass through onto audience and audiences. All of this from a comment with a dull academic group that was indexing dull documents from the 1700s. These Oxford College scientists discovered smutty anonymous poems attached inside the covers of the wholly respectable book, The Whole Shebang from the Earls of Rochester and Roscommon. Released 1714, the title’s bestseller status was recorded, yet never described, within the era if this sold more copies than the genius of Wordsworth, Keats and Coleridge. Now we all know that the astute writer spiced the dismal talent from the earls with the addition of Your Cabinet of affection, an accumulation of dirty verse. As word spread, the stodgy Works miscellany visited 20 models. Modern response to the scholarly find continues to be believe it or not spectacular. Newspaper editors are very well experienced within the lure of lusty content. Quotes in the 1714 book were gleefully circulated through the nation. Porn doesn’t guarantee a bestseller however it still will get observed, specially when associated with literary esteem. Likely to annual indication of the within the Literary Review, a London magazine that bestows unhealthy Sex Award on authors who overdo the eagerness. Nearer to home, the Darling Newspaper Press wasn’t unhappy lately to uncover its most widely used book is Murder Piping Hot, a contemporary whodunit that relies upon some obscene poems by Robert Burns. Author Ann Morven said now: “Poets are passionate people, and they are murderers. It had been finding the lewd rhymes by Scotland’s great poet that provided the unusual plot.”
Oops! He appears to become the kind of guy who, once he will get a concept into his mind, sits onto it. – THE Protector NEWSPAPER.
Bittersweet Guy Booker Prize This is a lovely story worth the bittersweet pen of Dame Beryl Bainbridge herself. This popular British author was shortlisted an archive five occasions for that Booker Prize, but lost narrowly every time. She died this past year at age 75. Now, like a tribute, the Guy Booker Better of Beryl prize continues to be introduced. The only real nominations are Dame Beryl’s five unlucky books. The general public will election between your Dressmaker, The Bottle Factory Outing, An Awfully Large Adventure, Every Guy For Themself and Master Georgie. The winning title is going to be introduced in April. For Beryl Bainbridge fans there’s additionally a treat available. Her final novel, The Lady within the Polka Us dot Dress, arrives for release in June. It can’t enter the 2010 Guy Booker since living authors qualify. The plot is really a double murder mystery occur 1968 within the U . s . States, rocked through the murder of civil-privileges crusader Martin Luther King. Happy reading through! from Trina, world wide web.booktaste.com, 18 February 2011.
Have you ever wondered why one movie musical receives critical acclaim and maybe even an Academy Award and another movie based on an equally good Broadway musical ends up on a studio shelf, rarely seen after its initial release? There are several key factors that lead to a quality movie musical. These factors include a strong story line and well-written screenplay, quality music, great casting, and effective direction. Great choreography is often a plus but a movie musical, unlike a Broadway musical, can be a quality movie without elaborate dances. In this article, I compare two movie musicals based on successful Lerner and Loewe Broadway musicals — “My Fair Lady” and “Camelot” — and I discuss why “My Fair Lady” was an acclaimed, award-winning movie that is still viewed and loved by millions of people and why “Camelot” has become a mostly forgotten film.
Both plays were successes on Broadway, although “My Fair Lady” did receive more praises than “Camelot” and it ran for a significantly longer time. Nevertheless, “Camelot” had a healthy initial Broadway run and both plays have had three short-run revivals on Broadway. Also, both plays earned Tony awards for their male leads and Tony nominations for Julie Andrews, the leading female star in both plays. Yet, the movies based on the plays had vastly different outcomes, with “My Fair Lady” garnering eight Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Actor, and Camelot earning only three minor awards. So, where did “Camelot,” the movie, go wrong?
Plot and Screenplay
Both plays and movies were based on good works of literature — “My Fair Lady” on the play “Pygmalion” by George Bernard Shaw, and “Camelot” on the book “The Once and Future King” by T. H. White. The screenplays were both authored by an experienced and award-winning author, Alan Jay Lerner, who also wrote the lyrics for the songs in both works. Therefore, the story lines and screenplays do not seem to be where the differences lie. In fact, the plot of “Camelot,” with its historic setting, romantic entanglements and scenes of chivalry and war, made it a better vehicle for film than “My Fair Lady” with its dialog-filled, actionless scenes.
The scores from “My Fair Lady” and “Camelot,” both written by Frederick Loewe and Alan Jay Lerner, are wonderful, with a good blend of beautiful melodies and sometimes poignant and other times humorous lyrics. Both shows had one major hit romantic ballad — “On the Street Where You Live” for “My Fair Lady” and “If Ever I Would Leave You” for “Camelot” — and both songs were dubbed in the movies by professional singers. The songs for the male lead are more melodious in “Camelot” and, at least in the movie version, the male lead, Richard Harris, had a better singing voice than Rex Harrison had in “My Fair Lady.” With basically equivalent scores, it seems that it is not the music that distinguishes the two works.
Although Richard Harris was the perfect King Arthur, casting is one major area where the movie version of “Camelot” fell short of its potential. Both plays starred Julie Andrews and her beautiful voice added much to the already great scores, but, unfortunately, she was not cast as the female lead in either film. However, the producers of the movie version of “My Fair Lady” had the good sense to hire Audrey Hepburn who was perfectly cast as Eliza Doolittle. She had the innocence and fragility needed for the role with just enough fire in her to finally rebel against Henry Higgins, while still leaving the audience sympathetic to her. On the other hand, the female lead in “Camelot,” Vanessa Redgrave, although an extremely gifted actress, was miscast as Guenevere. She presents the character as a cold, selfish woman who is indifferent to the tragedy she brings to her husband and his empire. Unfortunately, she was permitted to do her own singing with the result of a lessening of the impact of some of the songs in “Camelot.” On the other hand, Audrey Hepburn’s singing was dubbed by Marni Nixon, a singer with a beautiful, trained voice.
The casting of the third lead character in each film also differed in quality. In “My Fair Lady,” Colonel Pickering was played by a distinguished English actor, Wilfrid Hyde-White, whose acting was excellent. Unfortunately, the key role of Lancelot in “Camelot” was played by a novice Italian actor, Franco Nero, with limited command of English. Although he certainly fit the role physically, with his exceptional good looks, his acting was stiff and his delivery of lines was almost robotic.
The male leads in both films were perfect. In fact, the casting of Richard Harris probably saved “Camelot” from being a disaster. He was so well-cast as King Arthur that after the film, he became associated with the role and played it in several major productions, including one on Broadway and one in London.
Both movies had well-known and well-respected directors, but their approaches to directing the films were vastly different. George Cukor, the director of “My Fair Lady,” let the story and music give the movie its strength and character. There were no special effects used and no unique filming techniques, but, rather, just good direction of excellent actors and actresses performing on studio lots. Cukor used the strong screenplay and beautiful music of “My Fair Lady” to guide his direction.
On the other hand, Joshua Logan, the director of “Camelot,” used far too many close-ups that had the audience focused on the leads’ make-up rather than on the strong plot and music. In some scenes, instead of presenting a natural context for appreciating the songs or dialog, Logan chose to fill the large screen with the actors faces, resulting in a distracting rather than enhancing effect.
Although both “My Fair Lady” and “Camelot” had the potential to be great films, “Camelot” lacked two of the four factors necessary for a quality movie musical. These factors, strong story line and well-written screenplay, quality music, great casting, and effective direction, could be used to compare other movie musicals, for example, “Gigi” and “Brigadoon” or “Oklahoma” and “South Pacific,” and the results would be similar. A movie musical that is deficient in even one of the four factors could make the difference between a film that lives on for generations or one that gets lost on a shelf.
Copyright 2008 Claire J Rottenberg, All rights reserved
– You have permission to publish this article electronically in free-only publications such as a website or an ezine as long as the bylines and all hyperlinks are included. If you post this article on a website/forum/blog, all URLs must be set to hyperlinks (clickable links).
– You are not allowed to change or delete any words or links in the article or resource box. Paragraph breaks must be retained with the article.
– You are not allowed to post/reprint this article in any sites/publications that contain or support hate, violence or pornography or in any indecent or illegal sites/publications.
– You are not allowed to use this article in UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email) or SPAM.
– You are not permitted to insert affiliate links into any part of this article or into the author’s resource box.
People who visit Kansas City, Missouri can sometime be surprised at how much there is to see in a city that looks so historic. The city hall was built in 1937 using an architectural style that was common for the era. When you look at the Kansas City official city hall building, you start to notice carvings and cut-outs on the building that tell the story of the city itself. The city hall building is just one reason to get a room in a Kansas City hotel and see the sights that the city has to offer. There is a lot of history and natural beauty in and around the city that people from outside the area may not be completely familiar with. Kansas City played a key role in expanding the old west and it has many historical sites that people can visit to get a flavor for the American history in this old city. There is a lot to do in Kansas City that can keep you fascinated for a very long time.
Getting a Kansas City hotel room will allow you to visit the many national parks and natural sites that the area has to offer. The city itself is filled with small public parks that people can relax in and enjoy the day. Parks such as Budd Park, Jarboe Park and Hodge Park are all city parks that are found in and around the city itself. Most of the parks offer natural trails for hiking and bicycle riding. There are public golf courses for visitors to enjoy as well as plenty of lakes and streams for fishing, boating and swimming. The landscape of the Kansas City area is unlike anything you will find in any other part of the country and can be an escape from the rest of the world.
The history of the area is captured in its many museums and historical centers. When you stay in a Kansas City hotel, you can visit the Battle of Westport Museum or the Lakeside Nature Center. There is plenty of history to be learned in the museums of Kansas City as well as an appreciation for the wilderness that surrounds the cities. The Liberty Memorial and World War I museum is a great place to see the contributions that Kansas City made to the first great World War as well as paying your respects to the men and women that died for the cause.
If you and the family are looking for a Kansas City hotel room, then get one close to the Kansas City Zoo. There is plenty for a family to do when visiting Kansas City for a day, a week or even longer.
With only 500 days till the opening ceremony, tickets for the Olympic Games in London have gone on sale today (15th March 2011). Those hoping to attend one of the many events can apply to get their hands on one of the 6.6 million tickets available from the London 2012 website over a 6 week period.
With prices varying from 20 to over 2,000, attendance is not restricted to an elite select, with affordable tickets up for grabs for a variety of events.
The ballot system in operation has been designed to offer a fair chance to as many people as possible, whilst coping with the massive demands expected for such a prestigious event. It is hoped that the system will avoid any sever technical problems, namely a website crash as a result of the pressure of high traffic volumes.
The purchase window of 6 weeks allows for a calmer approach to ticket buying, and hopes to eradicate ticket touting. It is also hailed as a means to avoid a potentially unfair system of first-come-first-served.
The activity of ticket touting is being taken particularly serious, with the government threatening touts with a 20,000 maximum fine, raised from the initial 5,000 penalty.
While the more popular events and finals will obviously set punters back a fair amount, there are some 2.5 million tickets costing 20 and under, while various free events such as the marathon are also being promoted.
Concessionary prices are also in place, namely for children under 17 who will pay their age to view the early event heats, and for those over 60 for whom the same events will cost them 16.
Though there are a number of affordable tickets available, for some the cost of travel and accommodation is simply an unrealistic expense. Games will fail to attract significant numbers outwith the London area, for precisely these reasons. A flight, hotel and living expenses whilst in London can all add up to a considerable amount.
However, many see this as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and are willing to part with the costs to take part in such an historic and prestigious occasion. With the plentiful amount of hotels, B&Bs and guesthouses throughouth London, there will hopefully be no shortage of accomodation for travelling spectators.
Furthermore, with some events taking place in northern England and Scotland – mainly football – there are several opportunities for those further north to experience the games without travelling to London.
However, whether you need a Westminster hotel in the heart of the city of London, or a hotel in Glasgow to see some Olympic football, it would be wise to book up early to avoid disappointment come July 2012.
My name is Jonathan Clark. I am an NLP Trainer and I have been running these kinds of courses for sixteen years. I certify people at Practitioner and Master Practitioner level, and I am always trying to make my courses better and better. That is my business. Yes, I am in the NLP Training business, but my style and approach does not suit everyone. My intention here is to give you some hints and tips about how to choose an NLP Provider, because the varying standards in the NLP community affect my reputation.
I have personally attended several NLP Practitioner, Master Practitioner and Trainers Training courses, as well as countless other seminars and workshops. I have invested tens of thousands in training, and I have been on all kinds of courses, from the really awful to the totally mind blowing!
Maybe you know someone who has done an NLP training and you have noticed how much they have changed. Possibly you read an NLP book and like what you have seen so far.
There are a whole bunch of things I think you need to think about before you spend a whole lot of time, money and energy. Think about it – you will probably only ever do one NLP Practitioner course in your lifetime, so you had better get it right.
You see, I’ve learned that NLP training is the subject of much confusion. In fact, people have so many misconceptions about NLP that I decided to offer this consumer awareness guide so when you select an NLP company, you can make an informed & intelligent decision.
NLP came about through modelling how things work. Many NLP Trainers teach you one set of principles, yet seem to live by another. While the syllabus is usually the same, the method of delivery and standards of training vary dramatically.
In every course I have attended there was usually one or two things that could have been better – it would have made it so much easier if the parking was free, or if the venue had not been so stuffy, of if the Trainers actually kept in touch after the course finished. There was usually a hole somewhere that had not been filled, you know?
So let me give you some suggestions about what to look for. Think of it like buying a used car. It is useful to get someone in who knows a bit about cars, who can give it a once over and point out the tricks of the trade, the possible repairs needed, how much is a fair amount of money to spend, and to point you in the right direction. You get the idea.
As I said before, NLP Training is a big investment of time and money, so you need to know: 1.Where do you start? 2.How do you know what to look for?3.What are the danger signs to look for?4.How can you be certain that you are looking at a reputable company?
NLP is seductive and manipulative? So is wearing perfume or buying designer clothes to make you look good. There is a vast market for seduction and persuasion skills, and a number of NLP schools specialise in that.
Hunting For A Florist Columbia, SC Is Not Hardby Jane Smith
There are only a few items you should be aware of when selecting the right florist for a wedding, special event, or daily life. Knowledge of flowers and arrangements are one of the biggest things you should verify. You don’t want to try to get arrangements that aren’t in season because it could end up costing you a lot more money.
A quick call to a couple florists can yield some references to call and check with about quality, promptness, and pricing. Take the time to call all of the references, because they can be your best asset when choosing the right florist. The entire process should take less than 30 minutes, but can save you hours of headache.
One of the first places that most people go to look for a florist is the local phone book. The problem with some of these listings is that they are just big flower firms that have gotten listings in the local book and even gotten a local number. The reason this is somewhat of an issue is from the money standpoint. If you order from a big firm, they will likely just turn around and order the flowers from a local florist, but charge you additional money for doing so.
Educating you on how to best take care of your arrangements should be the next thing on your list. No one wants flowers that die in a couple of days. The first tips is to cut the stems of your flowers at an angle and not straight across. This allows for better water absorption. Next, be sure to change out the water in your flowers at least every 2 days. Bacteria can grow on the walls of your vase and speed the process of dying. So, use soap and water when cleaning out your vase every 2 days. Last, as nice as flowers look in a window, the heat coming through the glass can often times kill the flowers prematurely.
Don’t be afraid to ask for a discount. Most florists will offer some type of discount for senior citizens, professional groups, and often times regular customers that treat them fair. The bulk of flower shops restock on Monday mornings, so you can often get a better deal on Friday or Saturday on some of the older flowers.
Use these tips and tricks of the trade to make all your dealings with florists reasonable and great looking. Remember, buying local is definitely the way to go most times, as they large outfits contract with the local florists anyway. Save yourself some money and buy from a local florist.
It happens every spring, but this year, the questioning has been particularly intense. Every month of April, on occasion of the London Book Fair, newspapers publish articles speculating if it still makes sense to publish books.
At the turn of the century, one thousand book titles were published for every feature-length movie made. Today, the ratio is one to six hundred. The number of movies produced every year has increased and, at the same time, the number of published books has diminished.
“We live in a visual world,” sociologists argue. “In many areas, the written word is becoming a relic of previous centuries.” Media analysts blame the trend on video-games and portable DVD players. Others simply say that reading requires too much effort after our long work schedules.
In my view, those commentators are missing the point completely. Despite the abundance of cheap visual entertainment, readers’ motivation remains strong. The reason why people read books has nothing to do with the demands of society and everything to do with individual psychology.
1.- MINORITY VIEWS: Visual media, due to its structure and economics, is unable to express minority views in a consistent, intellectual manner. In this respect, all has been tried and all has failed. Complex ideas cannot be transmitted without the written word. No photograph and no movie can replace a chain of reasoning built in clear sentences.
2.- DIVERSITY: Films, television, and radio, despite the growing number of channels, can only thrive when they aim at large audiences. They can offer multiplicity in the multitude, but no original ideas. Digital video has reduced the budget necessary to make a movie, but not the distribution costs. Actors, good lighting, and a decent soundtrack are still expensive. Books, on the other hand, can still be published and distributed cheaply.
3.- FRESH IDEAS: In a movie, special effects cannot cure the problems of a weak scenario. Even great acting is unable to sustain a filmed story that doesn’t make any sense. How long ago is it since you saw a really thought-provoking movie? How often do you gain deep insights from watching television? The written word remains the ideal means to transmit innovative ideas.
The good news about reading is that three per cent of the population still remain avid readers. One out of thirty-three is not a bad proportion at all. A strong audience for writers is still there and it is not going to become smaller in the foreseeable future.
Do people read internet blogs for the same reason that they love books? Is it because they want to read original ideas? Do they do it in order to enjoy some fresh writing?
I suspect that, for most, the main drivers are the joy of discovering something new and a steadfast refusal to join the other thirty-two.
JOHN VESPASIAN writes about rational living. He has resided in New York, Madrid, Paris, and Munich. His stories reflect the values of entrepreneurship, tolerance, and self-reliance. See John Vespasian’s blog about rational living.